What We Say When We Talk About Writing: Seeking Common Ground Across the Curriculum

By Brian Graves and Jessica Pisano

Our motivating questions: How best to encourage and support writing beyond our first-year classes? Inspired in part by Mark Blaauw-Hara’s (2014) research on his campus, our research explores how UNCA faculty talk about writing with their students, what genres they assign, and what rhetorical features they expect.

I. Survey (52 responses, a 16% response rate)

Forms response chart. Question title: How many writing assignments do you typically ask students to complete in a semester?. Number of responses: 53 responses.

II. Focus Group (6 people, all of whom completed the survey; one each from biology, environmental science, music, philosophy, mass communication, and anthropology)

What do most students struggle with?

  • Reading / Following the prompt
  • Developing, organizing, and supporting arguments
  • Integrating & documenting sources (and avoiding plagiarism)
  • Grammar (tense shifts, passive/active voice)

What do students do well? 

  • Communicate ideas
  • Synthesize (sources & evidence)
  • Work hard
  • Ask questions
  • Take feedback
  • Navigate differences between disciplinary styles

What would the ideal FYW class include? 

  • Writing and rewriting
  • Peer review
  • Developing & supporting arguments
  • Attention to audience
  • Attention to grammar “basics” 
  • Awareness of different “types” of writing
  • Reflection on feedback
  • Time management
  • Writing concisely
  • Workshopping other students’ papers 
  • Low-stakes writing
  • Paraphrasing & summarizing

III. Writing Prompt Collection and Coding:

42 prompts from 15 disciplines

Limitations: 

  • Unsure what additional instructions were given in class (we only had the prompt to go by—no context)
  • Sample size—only 42 prompts
  • We only what people gave us (perhaps these professors were especially interested in writing?)

Our takeaways:

  • most prompts don’t explicitly state audience, purpose, or genre, but seem implicitly designed for instructor to assess what students know
  • few prompt for higher-order tasks 
  • limited awareness of and/or attention to the ways writing shifts based on discipline, context, and genre
  • focus group suggests that faculty don’t know what FYW course does, but the course does offer a lot of what they think it should
  • disconnect between goals and criteria as stated in the survey and prompt goals
  • we could better support student writing by helping students reflect on the choices they make when they write and fostering awareness of each writing situation